Blog

The hidden tragedy of this year’s A level figures

August 17th, 2020 by

On the face of it, this year’s A level results for languages show little change from the trends we have been seeing for years – entries for Spanish are up by 1%, those for French down 1%, and those for German down by about 6%. The continuing decline of German is, of course, extremely troubling – but nothing new.

What is a tragedy for language learning in the UK is the decline in entries for the so-called ‘Other Languages’. For years, we’ve consoled ourselves over the decline in French and German by the observation that entries for these other languages have been very healthy. Some, like Arabic, Polish, and Portuguese, have been increasing steadily year on year. In 2019, Other Languages represented around 30% of total language entries for A level, even though many are not taught in mainstream schools.

This year the Other Languages are down by 41%. The majority have seen entry figures decline by more than 50%.

% decline in A level entries, 2019-2020
Chinese -29%
Russian -18%
Polish -54%
Italian -19%
Arabic -53%
Turkish -54%
Portuguese -63%
Urdu -41%
Japanese -56%
Persian -55%
Panjabi -48%
Modern Greek -69%
Modern Hebrew -36%
Bengali -57%
Gujarati -96%
all other modern languages -41%

We can identify two reasons for this.

  1. New A level specifications

The new A level specifications for the majority of these languages were introduced in 2018, so 2020 is the first year in which they have been examined.

Evidence from last year suggests that the new arrangements have been a contributing factor in making these languages less accessible for pupils who study them outside of a mainstream school:

The new specifications for the languages starred in the list below (Chinese, Russian and Italian) were introduced a year earlier and it is notable that these languages saw declines between 2018 and 2019, when these exams were first taken, despite almost all the other languages seeing increases:

% change in entries, 2018-2019
Chinese* -32%
Russian* -35%
Polish 10%
Italian* -12%
Arabic 13%
Turkish 21%
Portuguese 13%
Urdu 0%
Japanese -13%
Persian -9%
Panjabi 5%
Modern Greek 24%
Dutch -82%
Modern Hebrew 27%
Bengali 12%
Gujarati -22%
all other modern languages -14%

*new specifications introduced 2019

  • Exceptional arrangements as a result of Covid-19

It is to be noted that entries for all the Other Languages – not just those for which new specifications have been introduced – have seen a decline in 2020. This leads us to the second reason, which must surely be the system of centre assessed grading introduced to replace exams cancelled because of Covid-19.

As the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Modern Languages pointed out in its consultation response to Ofqual in April, the majority of students taking an examination in their ‘community’ language are learning in contexts outside their school – in Saturday classes, at home, or in the community. Very few supplementary schools are registered as examination centres. This means that these pupils have effectively been excluded from the examination system this year.  In 2019, 3,368 more pupils took an A level in one of these languages than in 2020. What impact will this have on students’ chances of a university place? Or on their ability in future to provide evidence of the language skills they possess?

Double whammy

The combined effects of the two factors – the new specifications combined with this year’s centre assessment grading system, have resulted in the number of entries for Other Languages declining by 49% – see chart below. Nearly 5,000 pupils have been denied the opportunity to obtain a qualification that could have been critical to their future careers.

This is a shocking, tragic loss for the pupils and their families and for our country.

Leave a reply

8 responses to “The hidden tragedy of this year’s A level figures”

  1. […] Tinsley, of the language consultancy Alcántara Communications, who this week wrote a blog about reductions in language qualifications, pointed to the many entrants who studied the courses at home […]

  2. […] Tinsley, of the language consultancy Alcántara Communications, who this week wrote a blog about reductions in language qualifications, pointed to the many entrants who studied the courses […]

  3. […] Tinsley, of the language consultancy Alcántara Communications, who this week wrote a blog about reductions in language qualifications, pointed to the many entrants who studied the courses […]

  4. […] Tinsley, of the language consultancy Alcántara Communications, who this week wrote a blog about reductions in language qualifications, pointed to the many entrants who studied the courses […]

  5. […] Tinsley, of the language consultancy Alcántara Communications, who this week wrote a blog about reductions in language qualifications, pointed to the many entrants who studied the courses […]

  6. Graham says:

    Re; Chinese, the numbers enrolling are so skewed by the numbers of native speaker taking the exam. Unlike GCSE which is designed for non-native speakers (IGCSE targets native speakers), A level Chinese is really targeted at native speakers. As such, if you are non-native, there really is no point to take it as the forced distribution curve of grades will mean the native speakers will get the top grades and the non-natives the bottom grades. Its hard to see a way out of this conundrum. And then there is not a single UK university Chinese course that actually wants students to have A level Chinese as a condition. All university courses assume everyone is starting from scratch, and in fact many prefer you NOT to have A level. As a result the standard of Chinese of uni graduates is poor as there is no continuity of learning.

  7. Graham says:

    Again in the case of Chinese, so many native speakers do it outside of school as an extra subject, so what you are seeing is that the numbers now are probably more reflective of the number of students doing it as a taught A level in school. Really the question for Chinese should be how to prevent so many native speakers from studying it as an “easy” A level because this is putting a barrier up to non-native speakers who don’t want to study it as they fear they will necessarily get a bad grade.

    • Teresa Tinsley says:

      I wouldn’t like to ‘prevent’ so-called native speakers from taking an exam and it would be difficult to identify them too, but I get your point

Leave a Reply to A-level entrants who studied privately left without grades - Birmingham Times, Your Birmingham. Your News. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *